Well, I'm starting to be very confused with behaviour of team members. It's the best time for some feedback.... I don't really know what's going on, but it's look like "Let's decline EVERY map request for the most stupid thing".
Before you react or somebody react, I would like to write that this post isn't intended to dirty someone from any team. I'm only drawing attention to non-standard behavior of team members.
... Let's go the point ... All of us know, that every map should meet some requirements to be added to MP. Integration take too much time, also we have our own lives, etc. That's right, no problem with this.
So, what do you mean? Be specific please.
1 ) What is the most suspicious thing is that in the last time, there were mostly 50% of maps declined with sentence:
"Author don't have all rights to produce objects and splines!" - Really? And how you can know that? You have magic ball which tell you truth? Seems to be interesting... And how much maps which is added into MP HAVE all of the rights from authors? Maybe maximally 75% of them?
There is nice example number #1 - Königs Wusterhausen
Number #2 - Liepaja V4 Patch
2) German people reads Read me in other languages and use Google Translate. That's normal, nothing wrong. But when somebody use only half of sentence...
Commentary to this thread: Fiktivní Unhošť
I just downloaded the map and took a look at the read me.
Here on page 3 is translated into German
Quote DRIVING AROUND THE MAP
NO. Why you use only HALF of sentence?? There is written:
"Jak již bylo uvedeno, mapa není pro samotné hraní moc vhodná, ale jezdit se po ní dá, tedy pokud máte silnější sestavu."
"As already mentioned, map isn't good for suitbale playing , but you can drive on it, IF YOU HAVE STRONGER / BETTER PC components."
3) Map was declined due to deleted download file
Commentary to thread: Kydczice
This is another excuse to "we don't want this map"?
Well. Let's see. I clicked on the download link which is on the link and what I see? Download, woooow!
And what's happen if I click on second link with content for map? Ohhh, whaaaaat. It's working...
4) Trip Team don't know if lastest version of map is synced or not.
Somebody adds map/new update into MP, but he forgot to lock thread and set tag to "Approved or Declined". After some time, somebody answer that we will sync this map or etc, but it's already synced.
5) There are still tons of thread where were been given tag "In Process", but this threads even don't have any answer from any Team member. So you don't know if this map is forgotten forever or they will maybe work on them in future (these request are older than 1-3 months). These threads are very unclear compared to other where are sentences "Author of map is useless criminal who steal objects and splines without permissions!" very common.
6) Beta map.
"This map is BETA! We don't adding beta maps - your request was declined." I see similar answer last months very often. But why anybody say it?
Do you see word BETA in the name of the map? - No.
Do you see word BETA anywhere in readme? - No.
Do you see word BETA somewhere in the thread, map description? - No.
-> So why there are useless answers that this is beta? I don't really understand.
I will be appreciate any answer on my questions. Because, in the last times there are new excuses why to not adding map without any reason. You can't know if the author of map have permissions or not.
Have a nice afternoon,